Τα υπομνήματα στο Διαιτητικό "Δικαστήριο" της ΕΠΟ κατατέθηκαν από τους προσφεύοντες-παρεμβαίνοντες στις 12:00 το μεσημέρι της Παρασκευής.
Επομένως εκτός από τα καθ’ ημάς, στα ρηχά και θολά νερά του Πάρκου Γουδή, δε βλάπτει να αναδειχθούν τώρα - σε ουδέτερο χρόνο - και κάποια well established "δεδομένα" του πολιτισμένου ομοσπονδιακού ποδοσφαίρου:
Arbitration CAS 2014/A/3855 Clubul Sportiv Municipal Râmnicu Vâlcea v. Romanian Football Federation (RFF) & Romanian Professional Football League (RPFL), award of 15 September 2015 (operative part of 4 June 2015)
Panel: Mr Sofoklis Pilavios (Greece), Sole Arbitrator
"… 2. According to a general and well-established principle of procedural law, a party has standing to sue if it has an interest worthy of protection. This is deemed to be the case if an appellant is factually and directly affected by an appealed decision in a fashion that can be eliminated by its annulment. In this respect, a club has no “present interest” to obtain the annulment of a decision preventing it from being admitted to a first league, if there is no legal basis that would allow said club to be admitted to the first league, should the appeal be admitted.
3. The principle of non-retroactivity does apply to a rule which governs the requirements for being admitted to a competition. In this respect, the promotion and relegation of clubs cannot be governed by a set of rules which was adopted after the end of the relevant sporting season and amended the rules which were in force during said season. This would result in disrupting the legal position acquired by the participating clubs, which were entitled for promotion at the end of the relevant sporting season and would violate the expression of the concept of providing legal protection to a person who relies on the principle of good faith, as determined by the CAS jurisprudence and by the applicable national civil law…".